Monolayer-to-Mesoscale Modulation of the Optical Properties in 2D CrI3 Mapped by Hyperspectral Microscopy
Research article
M. Galbiati, F. Ramiro-Manzano, J. J. Pérez Grau, F. Cantos-Prieto, J. Meseguer-Sánchez, I. Kosic, F. Mione, A. Pallarés Vilar, A. Cantarero, D. Soriano and E. Navarro-Moratalla
Physical Review Letters 130, 176901 (2023) · Published 27 April 2023
Article summary
Hyperspectral microscopy maps the optical response of two-dimensional CrI3 from the monolayer to mesoscopic thicknesses, revealing few-layer, multilayer and bulk-like regimes.
Reference
M. Galbiati et al., “Monolayer-to-Mesoscale Modulation of the Optical Properties in 2D CrI3 Mapped by Hyperspectral Microscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 176901 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.176901
Figure 1. Spectroscopic characterization of CrI3. (a) Visible range transmittance spectra of CrI3 crystals with a different number of layers. Red curves correspond to thin layers (from 1 to 13 L), blue curves to layers ranging from 14 to ∼100 L, and green curves correspond to bulk (up to 164 L). (b) Polarized Raman scattering of CrI3 crystals with thicknesses in the few-layer (7 L), multilayer (30 L), and bulk (135 L) ranges. Red and blue curves have been taken with a 45° shift in the polarization angle with respect to the crystallographic axis. The small spectral shift of about 2 cm−1 confirms that the stacking order is monoclinic.
Source: M. Galbiati et al., Physical Review Letters 130, 176901 (2023); author personal website.
Figure 2. Evolution of the dielectric functions in CrI3 as a function of the layer number. The calculated real (ε1) and imaginary (ε2) parts of ε̃ are represented by color maps [(a),(b)] and line plots [(c),(d)], respectively.
Source: M. Galbiati et al., Physical Review Letters 130, 176901 (2023); author personal website.
Figure 3. Identification of different thickness regimes in CrI3. The few-layer, multilayer, and bulk thickness regimes are depicted according to (a) the layer dependence of ε1 and ε2 at 2.66 eV from the fitting process to the dataset shown in Fig. 1; (b) the low- (bottom) and high- (top) energy transmittance minima experimentally measured in the spectra of the dataset shown in Fig. 1, and additional ones, demonstrating the good reproducibility of the results (see Supplemental Material [24] Sec. 2.3). Dotted lines are guides to the eye. (c) Spatially resolved wide-field image of the high-energy transmittance dip position calculated from hyperspectral images of CrI3 flakes.
Source: M. Galbiati et al., Physical Review Letters 130, 176901 (2023); author personal website.
Figure 4. Theory calculations of the layer-dependent electronic and optical properties of CrI3. (a),(b) Evolution of ε1 and ε2 of CrI3 with an increasing number of layers calculated in the z direction perpendicular to the layers. (c) Projected band structure and DOS of monolayer CrI3. Filled and empty circles represent I p orbitals and Cr d orbitals, respectively. The size of the circles is the weight of the orbital wave function in each band. Red and blue stand for spin up and down, respectively. The yellow arrow shows the most probable transition responsible for the low-energy peak in the dielectric function. (d) Evolution of the low-energy peak of ε2 with an increasing number of layers.
Source: M. Galbiati et al., Physical Review Letters 130, 176901 (2023); author personal website.